Homosexual Privilege. Homosexual Supremacism.

So, it looks like the Religious Left might have found its candidate: Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Indiana. (You pronounce it “boot-edge-edge”.) He’s a practicing Episcopalian, happily married to a man, and unembarrassed by his religion. He went on Meet The Press yesterday and chastised Donald Trump for failing to uphold Christian values in certain ways. From the transcript:

CHUCK TODD: You said something rather strong about the president, that you said, “It’s hard to look at his actions and believe that they are the actions of somebody who believes in God.” How do you square that assessment with the fact that the Evangelical Christian community is so devoted to his candidacy?

MAYOR PETE BUTTIGIEG: Well, it’s something that really frustrates me because the hypocrisy is unbelievable. Here, you have somebody who not only acts in a way that is not consistent with anything that I hear in scripture or in church, where it’s about lifting up the least among us and taking care of strangers, which is another word for immigrants. And making sure that you’re focusing your effort on the poor. But also personally, how you’re supposed to conduct yourself. Not chest thumping look-at-me-ism, but humbling yourself before others. Foot washing is one of the central images in the New Testament. And we see the diametric opposite of that in this presidency. I think there was perhaps a cynical process where he decided to, for example, begin to pretend to be pro-life and govern accordingly. Which was good enough to bring many Evangelicals over to his side. But even on the version of Christianity that you hear from the religious right, which is about sexual ethics, I can’t believe that somebody who was caught writing hush money checks to adult film actresses is somebody they should be lifting up as the kind of person you want to be leading this nation.

CHUCK TODD: You grew up in arguably the most famous Catholic town in the country. I’m curious on abortion. I know what your position is, but how do you have a conversation about it? You’re in a community that is extraordinarily divided on this. On this issue. You have pro-life Democrats that don’t necessarily get courted nationally anymore. How do you square that? And what is your definition? When does life begin and is there any role for government in abortion?

MAYOR PETE BUTTIGIEG: So as someone who’s pro-choice but who has many friends and even supporters who view this issue very differently than I do, I think it begins by having some measure of good faith. And understanding that people arrive at their convictions on this often from a deeply felt and sincerely held place. But in my view, this is a question that is almost unknowable. This is a moral question that’s not going to be settled by science. And so the best way for it to be settled in practice is by the person who actually faces the choice. And when a woman is facing this decision in her life, I think in terms of somebody besides her who can most be useful in that, the answer to that would be a doctor. Not a male government official imposing his interpretation of his religion.

Actually, the question of the humanity of the unborn child is easy to settle by science. When the sperm fertilizes the egg, the result is a distinctly human entity that has begun a development process that will result in a baby. Whether or not the unborn human possesses moral personhood is not a question that science can answer.

Elsewhere, Buttigieg has defended the extreme abortion laws instituted recently by the state of New York and attempted by Virginia. Buttigieg is as far left on abortion as it gets among the Democrats.

Conservative commenter Erick Erickson lays into Buttigieg as a representative of progressive Christianity. He gives Buttigieg credit for pointing out the hypocrisy of Evangelicals who overlook or minimize Trump’s un-Christian behavior. But then he points out that Buttigieg’s heterodoxy on Christian sexual ethics, and on abortion, reveal him to be the same thing he criticizes in Trump-supporting Evangelicals:

As much as Buttigieg makes a valid critique on the President’s behavior and evangelicals excusing that behavior, Buttigieg wants to reject the inconvenient parts of faith he does not like. He is a gay man who got married; he does not think homosexuality is a sin despite express statements in scripture, and he thinks abortion is a moral issue and we cannot legislate our morality. Buttigieg wants to use the social obligations as Christians against the President, but wants to avoid any implication on the personal obligations of Christians in terms of clear Biblical sexual ethics and how we are to live our lives applying our faith even for “the least of these.”

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/pete-buttigieg-the-religious-left/comment-page-2/#comment-9346394


The most recent "Culture Wars" magazine has an excellent expose of this cultural charlatan, this creepy christian, that was written by E.  Michael Jones.

http://www.culturewars.com

Dr. Jones does not attack the egregious hypocrisy of this homosexual in this specific way but, as a homosexual, he gives himself, and others of his ilk, the liberty to ignore The Universal Objective Moral Code when it comes to homosexuality.

Mayor Pete Buttigieg is just the latest, but not the greatest, homosexual hypocrite who grants himself the liberty to ignore parts of the Universal Objective Moral Code (UOMC) while insisting all others adhere to the entirety of The UOMC.

After giving himself liberty to ignore the UOMC when it comes to his favorite mortal sins, he has no legitimate reason to complain if others (pedophiles and cannibals come to mind) do similarly.

But as a homosexual who actively subverts The UOMC, he sees himself as virtuous and the only way for you to be considered by him to be virtuous is for you you to accept this degrading and insane Homosexual Privilege, this Homosexual Supremacism.

Mr. Buttigie’s political gambit is Homosexual Privilege in action. It is also Homosexual Supremacism in action, and it is an action that stinks like the bottom of a monkey’s cage.

This is Homosexual Privilege, this is  Homosexual Supremacism in action. Homosexuals can do whatever the hell they want but not you. YOU must obey the Universal Objective Moral Code. or you're a bad person. 

Worse....

He blames God for his homosexuality  which is really no different than if a pedophile blamed God for his evil actions.

As Jones pointed out in his piece about this creep, God did not make him homosexual:

We emphatically reject this comparison. God made us black. God made us white. God did not make us homosexuals, or liars or alcoholics.

We did that to ourselves by our bad decisions. It is nothing short of blasphemy to blame our sins on God.