I Peter 5 Wrong on holocaust usage.

Author and talk show host Dennis Prager accurately observes that there is no greater concept in the first five books of the Bible than that of “distinction.” More specifically, it is the clear separation God makes between certain things: God and man, animal and human, life and death, sacred and profane, good and evil, male and female.

He even goes so far as to call these differences “God’s signature” on the created order. Like six pillars holding up a great house, when the structural integrity of those columns becomes significantly compromised, the whole house comes crashing down.

If these distinctions are rooted in divine authority, then blurring and obliterating them can be accomplished by undermining that authority. According to the eminent historian Arnold Toynbee, undermining divine authority is one of the hallmarks of the age we live in.

Toynbee says that in the first twenty ages of world history, people generally submitted themselves to some overarching religious metanarrative (e.g., Scripture and Tradition) for guidance in the affairs of life. In the twenty-first, the age we live in, he asserts that this has been jettisoned, and man has hitched his wagon to the star of secularism.

This goes all the way back to Eden, where the serpent said, “Hath God said?,” thereby casting doubt on the command that God had orally transmitted to Adam and Eve about what they could and couldn’t do in the garden. In tempting them with the promise that they would become gods, they succumbed, rebelled against God, and made themselves the arbiters of truth and morality. Thus, the distinction between God and man became obliterated, long ago laying the groundwork for Toynbee’s twenty-first age.

Other examples of the obliterating of distinctions are easy to furnish. Animal rights groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) call the slaughter of chickens a “Holocaust on a Plate,” equating such an act with the slaughter of Jews during the Holocaust.

++++++++++++++++++++

Hahaha. Yeah, that is what he said. But the author is a Shabbos Goy who thinks what the Jews want him to think and does what the Jews want him to do despite the fact that the Jewish Encyclopedia teaches the world what the Jews consider a Holocaust/Sacrifice and it is not the war crimes of Germany committed against them (and them alone).

But, the Shabbos Goy is happy to carry the rhetorical water for the Messias-Deniers despite what the Jewish Encyclopedia teaches about Holocaust:

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/7823-holocaust

The Jews can change the Biblical definition of Holocaust to convince the world that they have uniquely suffered but PETA can't change the changed definition of Holocaust.

If these distinctions are rooted in divine authority, then blurring and obliterating them can be accomplished by undermining that authority. According to the eminent historian Arnold Toynbee, undermining divine authority is one of the hallmarks of the age we live in.

The funny and sad thing is this hypocrite is accusing others (on behalf of those who reject Jesus Christ) of the very actions he is engaged in.

Maybe, some day, he will come to understand that, like the US Senate and US House of Representatives, his mind is also enemy occupied territory.