Abp. Ganswein's public support of an officially approved conspiracy theory

For it is September 11th, which in America - since the Fall of 2001 - has only been referred to as "9/11" in reference to that apocalyptic disaster in which members of the terrorist organization Al Qaeda attacked the United States of America as the whole world watched, in New York and Washington - using fully occupied passenger planes, which they had captured in-flight, as missiles.

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resources/politics/issues/the-nine-eleven-of-the-catholic-church

It is not too surprising that  our Hierarchy has entirely accepted the conspiracy theory of the American establishment that the caveman, Osama bin Laden, was the 911 perp because most of our Hierarchy have been deeply influenced by the propaganda of the Anglo-Zionist Empire.

https://thesaker.is/anglozionist-short-primer-for-the-newcomers/

But the reality is that the 911 perp prolly was Israel.

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-911-conspiracy-theories/

Most men are fearful of being labelled a conspiracy theorist because after decades of having the establishment propagandising its citizens that conspiracy theorists are insane most men are afraid of appearing insane - not however, ABS - and falling out of favor with one's family and friends.

https://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics/

But, much of history is undeniably the results of a conspiracy.

Now, there are conspiracies that are the Gospel  Truth, such as the conspiracy of Judas and The Jewish Sanhedrin to capture and put Our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, on trial and produce false testimony to try and incriminate Him.

Then Satan entered into Judas called Iscariot, who was one of the twelve; he went away and conferred with the chief priests and officers of the temple police about how he might betray him to them. They were greatly pleased and agreed to give him money. So he consented and began to look for an opportunity to betray him to them when no crowd was present. (Luke 22:3-6)

Matt 26:

57 But they holding Jesus led him to Caiphas the high priest, where the scribes and the ancients were assembled.	57   And those who had arrested Jesus led him away into the presence of the high priest, Caiphas, where the scribes and the elders had assembled.
58   Petrus autem sequebatur eum a longe, usque in atrium principis sacerdotum. Et ingressus intro, sedebat cum ministris, ut videret finem.	58   And Peter followed him afar off, even to the court of the high priest. And going in, he sat with the servants, that he might see the end.	58   Yet Peter followed him at a long distance, as far as the high priest’s palace; where he went in and sat among the servants, to see the end.
59   Principes autem sacerdotum, et omne concilium, quærebant falsum testimonium contra Jesum, ut eum morti traderent:	59   And the chief priests and the whole council sought false witness against Jesus, that they might put him to death:	59   The chief priests and elders and all the Council tried to find false testimony against Jesus, such as would compass his death.
60   et non invenerunt, cum multi falsi testes accessissent. Novissime autem venerunt duo falsi testes,	60   And they found not, whereas many false witnesses had come in. And last of all there came two false witnesses:

There are also conspiracies that are clearly absurd, such as the establishment one in which the caveman, Osama Bin Laden, was identified as the 911 perp.

So, the problem with a conspiracy is not whether a conspiracy is a conspiracy but whether or not a conspiracy appears to be believable or not.

If you think the caveman, Osama bin Laden, was the 911 perp then why would he deny that he had involvement with it?

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/topten-history/hires_images/FBI-456-UsamaBinLaden.jpg/view

He was already on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted List PRIOR to 911 and he knew the Anglo-Zionist Empire wanted him dead and so it would have only positively added to his legacy had he admitted involvement with the 911 attack.

But he didn't:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/interview-with-osama-bin-laden-denies-his-involvement-in-9-11/24697

If the reader clicks on the Unz column and reads the internal links - and the books he posts for free in html format - he will learn that Bush refused to offer proof to Afghanistan that bin Laden was the perp and so the Afghanistan gov't would not turn him over to the Anglo-Zionist Empire.

The reader will also learn that the faux 911 commission never officially fingered the caveman as the perp.

No, the whole idea that conspiracies are only for paranoid fools is useful propaganda because if the establishment identifies you as a conspiracy nut, they are under no obligation to provide a response to your sane objections to their insane official conspiracy that bin Laden was the 911 perp or any of the other conspiracy theories that Anglo-Zionist Empire uses try to hide the truth from its citizens - who are supposed to accept their silly conspiracy theories as the Gospel truth.

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=19AD5D98C8C51101BBDB06B4915407B4?doi=10.1.1.646.5570&rep=rep1&type=pdf