The accuser, that thing, and the Lie Detector.

The Bezos Blog (Washington Post) posted a story on the accuser and that thing as a way to propagandise you, the jury, in this public trial that has already ruined the reputation of the accused:

She engaged Debra Katz, a Washington lawyer known for her work on sexual harassment cases. On the advice of Katz, who said she believed Ford would be attacked as a liar if she came forward, Ford took a polygraph test administered by a former FBI agent in early August. The results, which Katz provided to The Post, concluded that Ford was being truthful when she said a statement summarizing her allegations was accurate.

Never underestimate just how evil are the wicked ways of Washington.

Journalists, it has been observed accurately, are political activists with a byline and note how rapidly those activists accepted the claims of the lawyer as accurate and trustworthy.

Hang on...what were the questions asked?  How many questions were asked?  What was the content of the questions asked? 

The lawyer knows that the average reader of The Bezos Blog will see the claims and automatically conclude that the questions had to do with the accusations made but, absent knowledge of the questions...

one can't even know that.

ABS thinks this is prolly what happened.

Lie Detector Tech:  I am going to ask you some questions and I just want you to answer honestly; let's begin;

What is your name?

What day is it?

OK, thank you, you have answered all the questions correctly.

Lying lawyer contacts The Bezos Blog and tells it the accuser passed the lie detector test and the readers think, Dang, she's prolly right and that Judge is guilty.

Even if the accused did that 36 years ago as a minor, would that exclude him from being a SCOTUS Judge?

Is the new standard in Washington to be that only the impeccable are acceptable?

Washington is wicked and the poor accused has been foully smeared like the wall of a toddler's room painted with his own poo poo.