Bitter Catholic Quisling on Kavanaugh
The rapidly aging spinster hates rich white men because that is who she used to date but not one of them wanted to marry her and so many (most?) of her columns are suffused with psychological projection consisting of the pain resulting from her stupid faith in feminism and a series of failed relationships.
She thought she could have it all but she couldn't and she is bitter - very bitter.
This latest column is embarrassingly revealing in its insipidty and irrational assertions - Kavanaugh is a synecdoche for ALL men and all men suck according to Dowd and she claims that there was a "purity" to the story of Dr. Ford.
Yes, there was a certain purity to her story in that it was not corrupted by such things as specific details or corroboration but such things are not needed by vain and vengeful harridans like Dowd.
Kavanaugh is a white privileged male and that alone is sufficient to declare him guilty.
Of course, as a nominal catholic columnist for the New York Times, she hates the church even more than her predecessor catholic quisling, Anna Quindlen, did.
One does not get to become a famous catholic columnist for the Jewish owned New York Times unless one is a catholic quisling.
Comments
Post a Comment