Dr. Ford could fight for her life. Babies targeted for abortion can't.
For the purposes of this post, let's concede that Ford's claim of sexual assault by Kavanaugh is accurate.
What is one thing that could be said about that claim that would also figure into the calculus of abortion and her studies providing support for RU 486?
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/09/blasey_fords_published_medical_research_includes_6_articles_on_mifepristone_aka_ru486.html
Well, one could conclude that she is in favor of aborting unwanted babies who do not have the ability - psychic, physical, or moral - to fight back against those attacking it whereas she did have the psychic, moral, and physical ability to fight back against the two men who, she claims, sexually assaulted her.
Why do sexually liberated extreme liberal commies like her complain about her male cohorts attacking her when she has the power to fight back against them while she is on the side of the deadly abusers who intentionally kill babies who do not have the slightest chance against their attackers?
Sexually liberated? Yeah...
https://www.teaparty.org/breaking-kavanaugh-accuser-set-cancel-senate-testimony-shocking-hs-yearbooks-reveal-drunken-sex-parties-extreme-racism-adult-male-dancers-325050/
And after being a victim of a drunken sexual assault by two males, she goes to work in a bar where adult men are drinking and likely to interpret her presence there as an open invitation to hit on her.
So, she is either traumatised so severely that she develops claustrophobia and becomes a depressed recluse who does poorly in her studies or she is traumatised so severely that she chooses to work in a bar where a bunch of men are drinking.
Yep, makes sense for she who was known as a party girl because no matter what she chooses to do - even diametrically opposed choices - proves she is a victim because women never lie...
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/20/christine-blasey-ford-remembered-dewey-beach-bar-s/
One guesses the triangle she was involved in with two other men that resulted in violence (two boys fighting over her) could not possibly have been reinterpreted by her in the intervening 30 plus years so it resulted in her politically reframing the event with her cast as the sympathetic victim of violence instead of one of her boyfriends being the victim so as to destroy the chances of a Judge being elevated to the SCOTUS because he is allegedly pro-life.
Nope. Impossible...
What is one thing that could be said about that claim that would also figure into the calculus of abortion and her studies providing support for RU 486?
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/09/blasey_fords_published_medical_research_includes_6_articles_on_mifepristone_aka_ru486.html
Well, one could conclude that she is in favor of aborting unwanted babies who do not have the ability - psychic, physical, or moral - to fight back against those attacking it whereas she did have the psychic, moral, and physical ability to fight back against the two men who, she claims, sexually assaulted her.
Why do sexually liberated extreme liberal commies like her complain about her male cohorts attacking her when she has the power to fight back against them while she is on the side of the deadly abusers who intentionally kill babies who do not have the slightest chance against their attackers?
Sexually liberated? Yeah...
https://www.teaparty.org/breaking-kavanaugh-accuser-set-cancel-senate-testimony-shocking-hs-yearbooks-reveal-drunken-sex-parties-extreme-racism-adult-male-dancers-325050/
And after being a victim of a drunken sexual assault by two males, she goes to work in a bar where adult men are drinking and likely to interpret her presence there as an open invitation to hit on her.
So, she is either traumatised so severely that she develops claustrophobia and becomes a depressed recluse who does poorly in her studies or she is traumatised so severely that she chooses to work in a bar where a bunch of men are drinking.
Yep, makes sense for she who was known as a party girl because no matter what she chooses to do - even diametrically opposed choices - proves she is a victim because women never lie...
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/20/christine-blasey-ford-remembered-dewey-beach-bar-s/
One guesses the triangle she was involved in with two other men that resulted in violence (two boys fighting over her) could not possibly have been reinterpreted by her in the intervening 30 plus years so it resulted in her politically reframing the event with her cast as the sympathetic victim of violence instead of one of her boyfriends being the victim so as to destroy the chances of a Judge being elevated to the SCOTUS because he is allegedly pro-life.
Nope. Impossible...
Comments
Post a Comment