Anarcho-Tyranny in the modern church

Samuel Francis argued that the problems of managerial state extend to problems of crime and justice. In 1992, he introduced the word “anarcho-tyranny” into the paleocon vocabulary.[28] He once defined it this way: “we refuse to control real criminals (that's the anarchy) so we control the innocent (that's the tyranny).”[29]

In one of his last essays, he explained the concept:

What we have in this country today, then, is both anarchy (the failure of the state to enforce the laws) and, at the same time, tyranny—the enforcement of laws by the state for oppressive purposes; the criminalization of the law-abiding and innocent through exorbitant taxation, bureaucratic regulation, the invasion of privacy, and the engineering of social institutions, such as the family and local schools; the imposition of thought control through “sensitivity training” and multiculturalist curricula, “hate crime” laws, gun-control laws that punish or disarm otherwise law-abiding citizens but have no impact on violent criminals who get guns illegally, and a vast labyrinth of other measures. In a word, anarcho-tyranny.[30] ...

It is revealing that the modern Church engages in its own brand of revolutionary anarcho-tyranny. It punishes the Traditionalists and fetes, favors, and elevates into the Hierarchy sodomites, socialists and heretics.

The laws that are enforced are either those that extend or entrench the power of the state and its allies and internal elites … or else they are the laws that directly punish those recalcitrant and “pathological” elements in society who insist on behaving according to traditional norms—people who do not like to pay taxes, wear seat belts, or deliver their children to the mind-bending therapists who run the public schools; or the people who own and keep firearms, display or even wear the Confederate flag, put up Christmas trees, spank their children, and quote the Constitution or the Bible—not to mention dissident political figures who actually run for office and try to do something about mass immigration by Third World populations.[32]

Francis argued that anarcho-tyranny is built into the managerial system and cannot be solved simply by fighting corruption or voting out incumbents. In fact, he says that the system generates a false “conservatism” that encourages people to act passively in the face of perpetual revolution. He concludes that only by devolving power back toward law-abiding citizens can sanity be restored. [33] 

++++++++++++++ end quotes +++++++++

In its wisdom, the establishment in America has turned a country that in 1960 was 90% white and over 75 % Christian into a Neo-Yugoslavia; a country that was multi-cultural, multi-religious, multi-ethnic, multi-lingual and we all know how well things worked out for Yugoslavia.

America is on a the path to a civil war because the establishment has invited into America a larger number of aliens than the number of German troops who invaded Russia in Operation Barbarossa.

Since 1965, America has had the biggest influx of foreigners into its country than any other country in any other time frame in history.

If a small community of white Christians in, say, Maine, has the Catholic Bishops of America being paid to resettle black muslims from Somalia into that community we know that will make that community stronger because Diversity.

Nothing strengthens a community more than by rapidly remaking it by inviting in and resettling foreigners there who are of a different race, who speak a different language, who have a different culture, who have not the slightest clue about or experience with the concepts of English Common Law and who worship a completely different God